UNITED STATES

Designing Masculinity:
The Marlboro Man

Illustration of what looks like a cowboy – the ground covered with cigarette butts

Just like Nike’s swoosh, Coca-Cola’s script, and Apple’s bitten fruit, the Marlboro man is no stranger to the public eye. They are not just logos and campaigns, but symbols that shape how people see themselves. Marlboro did not just sell cigarettes – it sold an idealized version of masculinity: the independent, macho, white cowboy. Thus, a construct of a cultural image of the “American Man” was created. Through its visual language, Marlboro shaped masculinity itself.

Filtered cigarettes today are the predominant type of tobacco sold in America. However, in the early 1950s, it was considered a “woman’s smoke”. In 1957, the advertising agency Leo Burnett was asked to transform the filtered cigarette brand into something more masculine-oriented.1 Thus, Leo Burnett designed one of the most effective marketing campaigns that sought to fill the gap in tobacco consumerism, which drastically elevated the Marlboro company on a global scale. The now familiar cowboy of Marlboro became a standard imagery by the 60s because it became a universal symbol of “admired” masculinity. Which also begs the question- what kind of man smokes Marlboro Cigarettes and why?

The Marlboro Man campaigns depicted a cowboy, always a white male. Strong, rugged, sometimes weathered. Just your “typical” American cowboy. He’s always alone, performing solitary tasks to emphasize self-sufficiency in wide open spaces. Other elements one might see in these campaigns are natural lighting, the absence of urban life, and cigarettes are always present. Moreover, the typography is clean and bold, the colors are kept simple, but the framing remains cinematic. Visually, these campaigns played on cinematic codes parallel with Western films. This aesthetic made the campaigns arguably timeless, yet reinforced the illusion of freedom.

The campaigns were born into post-war America, defined by the nation's hunger for individuality. Clearly, to romanticize the return to suburban life, hence the Western aesthetics, yet also underlining traditional gender roles. Moreover, would the aftermath of the Cold War raise the demand for clear ideological contrasts, such as freedom versus collectivism, capitalism versus communism, and so forth. Within this climate of post-war, the cowboy almost emerged as a powerful national symbol of autonomy, especially for men during the post-war.

On the surface, advertising doesn’t just sell products. It sells an “ideal” or “lifestyle”. In this case, however, the Marlboro Man Campaign sold the “ideal man”. It is not about the product anymore; it is about who is buying it. It is about ideology and individualism. This emotional power comes from what Jib Fowles describes as “advertising’s basic appeals.” - The psychological needs that ads promise to satisfy.2 The most notable appeal we see in the Marlboro Man Campaigns is the need for autonomy. Visualized through a cowboy who is always alone and self-sufficient. Which might imply that freedom is only found in solitude. A delusion of independence is created and reinforced by the absence of women, supervisors, cities, and obligations. Perhaps a delusion that resonates with men in post-war America. The connection between historical events and personal desires discloses how advertising works as a mirror for its cultural context.

Zoomed in illustration of a marbled statue holding cigarette

Moreover, advertising sells an “ideal”– Hegemonic masculinity plays a part in its effects on branding and shapes the social construct that is gender roles. Hegemonic masculinity is the construction of an ideal and does only truly exist within social, cultural, and historical frames.3 It is a fabricated ideal, maintained through patterns of consumption. Thus, advertising becomes its own genre; a cultural space where aspirations are visualized, marketed, and internalized as desirable lives for you to resonate with.

The Marlboro Man Campaign also raises questions about race and representation. The cowboy, as depicted in these advertisements, is consistently a white, masculine American figure: a narrow description of the masculine ideal. This racialized imagery played a crucial role in shaping patterns of consumption. Surveys show that smoking levels were approximately 24% higher for men than for women, as well as a race-based analysis revealed a striking divide in brand preference: White American youths smoked Marlboro products at nearly six times the rate of their African American counterparts.4 The campaign thus not only strengthened a gendered ideal, but also a racialized vision of national identity, one that linked whiteness to freedom, autonomy, and modern consumerism. Meaning that the Marlboro Man campaign created and functioned as implicit cultural propaganda. Placed in its context (1950-60s), it was evidently important to advertise celebrated freedom through consumption. In a way, buying a product meant participating in selective democracy. The Marlboro Man was not a strategic advertisement; it became a symbol of American ideology and independence, suiting only white masculinity.

Illustrated full-body of the statue of David with a cowboy hat and holding a cigarette

To summarize, the Marlboro Man campaigns did not only serve as merely clever marketing but rather a cultural phenomenon that reinforced post-war America’s values and ideals. By morphing the once feminine filtered cigarette to symbolize rugged manhood, Marlboro’s branding ties in with the nation’s identity, hence why it was an effective campaign. Marlboro Man represented freedom- values deeply rooted in American ideology. Moreover, to the lens of Fowles’ “basic appeals,” we explored how the campaign arguably capitalized on the psychological need for autonomy. The Marlboro man is not just a smoker. He was a cowboy portrayed as a man unbound by obligations, which would be relevant for its demographic. This portrayal, however, offered an illusion rather than reality; freedom only exists through consumption.

As Knudsen and Andersen discovered, hegemonic masculinity thrives within contexts and timing. Case in point, the Marlboro Man became a vehicle for a myth that the advertisement could blur the line between consumerism and identity. Furthermore, the campaign consisted of exclusivity through its portrayal of the white, self-sufficient male. This revealed how deeply gender and race were planted in the construction of the American ideal. In a way, freedom and independence were marketed as inherently white and masculine traits, aligning with national myths of Cold War ideology. Ultimately, the Marlboro Man stands as both a product and producer of its time. It serves as an example of how advertising not only reflects society but also scripts it- turning something like cigarettes into symbols of autonomy, and autonomy into a cultural illusion of what it means to be a man and an American.

Endnotes

  1. Daniel K. Cortese, and Pamela M. Ling, 2011, “Enticing the New Lad.” National Library of Medicine. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3115651/.
  2. Jib Fowles, 1982, “ADVERTISING'S FIFTEEN BASIC APPEALS.” JStor. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42575622?seq=1.
  3. Gry H. Knudsen, and Lars P. Andersen, 2020, “Changing Masculinity, One Ad at a Time.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. https://www.westminsterpapers.org/article/id/292/.
  4. Cameron White, John L. Oliffe, and Joan L. Bottorff, 2013, “From Promotion to Cessation: Masculinity, Race, and Style in the Consumption of Cigarettes, 1962–1972.” National Library of Medicine. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3673252/.

Bibliography

Cortese, Daniel K. and pamela M. Ling. “Enticing the New Lad.” National Library of Medicine. (2011). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3115651/

Fowles, Jib. ADVERTISING'S FIFTEEN BASIC APPEALS. JStor. (1982). https://www.jstor.org/stable/42575622?seq=1

Knudsen, Gry H. and Lars P. Andersen. “Changing Masculinity, One Ad at a Time.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 15, nr. 2 (2020), 63–78. https://www.westminsterpapers.org/article/id/292/

White, Cameron, John L. Oliffe and Joan L. Bottorff. From Promotion to Cessation: Masculinity, Race, and Style in the Consumption of Cigarettes, 1962–1972. National Library of Medicine. February 14, 2013. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23409887/

Back to the Framework